WORX 163 vs 170: My Honest Trimmer Verdict

Choosing between the WORX 163 and 170? It all comes down to one key question: Do you want something light and simple, or do you need more control and better edging?

I’ve used both models for months around my mid-sized yard—trimming fence lines, cleaning up garden beds, and edging sidewalks. This wasn’t just an unboxing. I put both tools to the test in real yard work.

As someone who’s used cordless trimmers for a few seasons now, I’ll show you where each model shines—and where it falls short. If you’re looking for clear, honest advice before you buy, keep reading. This guide will help you pick the right one for your yard.

WORX 163 Review: My Honest Take After Months of Yard Work

If you’re looking into the WORX 163, you’re probably asking: Is this cordless trimmer worth it for my yard? I’ve used the WORX WG163 GT 3.0 for a full mowing season here in the U.S.—spring to fall—and I’m ready to share what it’s really like.

In short: The WORX 163 is a lightweight, cordless trimmer and edger. It runs on a 20V Max Lithium battery, feels easy in the hand, and has some cool features like Command Feed line control and a pivoting head.

It’s not meant for knee-high weeds. But for light work and edge touch-ups, it’s done better than I thought. Here’s how it holds up:

What I Like About the WORX 163

These are the things that stood out while I used it around my yard—fence lines, flower beds, and edges.

• Lightweight (Only 5.3 lbs with battery): I trim a couple times a week, and this thing is light. That means less pain in my arms and shoulders.
• Two Tools in One: Trimmer + Edger: The head flips quick between trim and edge modes. The edge guide helps me keep a clean line along walks and beds.
• Command Feed Line System: No more bumping the head to feed line. Just press a button. It’s simple and quick.
• Adjustable Shaft and Handle: I’m 5’10”, and my wife is shorter. We can both use it easy thanks to the adjustable shaft and grip.
• Battery Works with Other WORX Tools: I use the same 20V battery in my WORX blower and drill. That saves time and space.
• Much Quieter Than Gas: It’s not silent, but quiet enough to use in the morning. I don’t worry about waking the neighbors.

What Could Be Better

Even though I like the WORX 163, it’s not perfect.

• Not for Thick or Wet Grass: It works great in light grass. But when it’s thick or damp, the motor slows down.
• Short Line Feed: The line feed works, but I have to press it a lot. One click doesn’t always give me much line.
• Single Line (Not Dual): It only uses one string. That’s fine for small jobs, but two lines would cut faster in thick grass.
• Charger Is Slow: Takes 3–5 hours to charge. Not bad, but slower than some other tools I’ve used.

My Hands-On Experience

This May, after a week of rain, I used the WORX 163 to trim my yard. The grass was short but wet. I didn’t want to drag out my gas tool for a small job.

It worked fine in most areas—beds, mulch, and fence lines. But the back corner had thick grass, and I had to go slow. It still cut, but not fast.

Another time, I edged the drive. The pivoting head and wheel made clean lines with no fuss.

Performance Overview

Feature	Rating	Notes
Cutting Power	3.5/5	Great for light grass, not for brush
Battery Life	4/5	20–30 mins per charge
Ease of Use	5/5	Super light and easy to run
Edging Performance	4.5/5	Clean lines with the edge guide
Noise Level	4.5/5	Much quieter than gas
Durability	4/5	Feels solid for a plastic build
Value for Money	4.5/5	Best when bought as a kit

Who Should Buy the WORX 163?

Best for:

• Homeowners with small to medium yards (under ¼ acre)
• First-time trimmer users
• Anyone who wants to avoid gas
• People with other WORX 20V tools

Not ideal for:

• Large yards with heavy growth
• Pros or landscapers
• Folks who want fast charging

If your yard is like mine—modest and easy to manage—the WORX 163 is a smart, no-fuss pick.

Final Thoughts

The WORX 163 isn’t flashy. But it’s simple, quiet, and works well.

For small trims, fast edge jobs, and light grass, it does more than I thought it could. I still use my gas tool for big jobs—but for everything else, the WORX 163 has earned its place in my shed.

👉🏿👉🏻 Check Latest Price and Offer at Amazon 👈🏻👈🏿

WORX 170 Review: My Real-World Experience with This Cordless Trimmer

If you’re checking out the WORX 170 — also called the WORX WG170 GT Revolution — here’s my honest take after using it for months. This cordless trimmer caught my eye because it claims to do three jobs: trim, edge, and mow.

For context, I take care of a mid-sized yard here in the U.S. It’s not tiny, but not huge either. I didn’t want a loud gas trimmer. I just needed something light, simple, and cordless. The WORX WG170 checked all those boxes. It runs on WORX’s 20V Power Share battery system, so if you already own their tools, you can swap batteries with ease.

What I Like About the WORX 170

These are the things I found most useful while trimming around fences, garden beds, and sidewalks.

• Lightweight but Feels Strong (5.5 lbs with Battery): This tool is light, but it doesn’t feel cheap. You can use it for 20–30 minutes without getting tired.
• Three Tools in One: Trimmer, Edger, and Mower: You can switch between modes in seconds. The head adjusts, and the wheels help you edge in a straight line.
• Adjustable Shaft and Handle: Both the shaft and grip move to fit your height. I’m just under 6 feet tall, and it fits me well. My wife (5’3″) can use it too with no trouble.
• Command Feed Spool System: Just press a button to advance more line. No need to bump the head, which makes trimming smoother.
• Battery Swaps with Other WORX Tools: I already had a WORX blower and drill. I just pop in the same battery. That saves time, money, and space.
• Quieter Than Gas: I do yard work in the mornings or evenings. This trimmer is quiet enough that it won’t wake the neighbors or hurt your ears.

What Could Be Better

It’s a solid tool, but not perfect. Here’s what could improve.

• Single-Line Trimmer (Not Dual-Line): It only uses one line. That works for light jobs, but dual-line trimmers cut thick grass faster.
• Not for Thick Weeds or Brush: This isn’t made for wild overgrowth. It’s best for normal, weekly trimming.
• Battery Charging Takes a While: Charging a battery takes 3–5 hours. It’s not super slow, but I’d suggest having a second one ready to go.
• Line Feed Can Be Fussy: The Command Feed button works most of the time, but sometimes I need to press it a few times before it feeds.

My Hands-On Yard Experience

One spring weekend, my backyard fence line got a little wild. Not a jungle, but worse than usual. I grabbed the WORX 170, switched it to trim mode, and got to work.

For the first 15–20 minutes, it breezed through most spots—even tall patches and some dandelions. The tilting head made it easy to trim around beds. Then I switched to edge mode for the driveway. The wheels helped me make straight lines with no fuss.

Around the 25-minute mark, the battery started to run out. I grabbed a spare from my blower and kept going. That battery swap feature really came in handy.

Performance Overview

Feature	Rating	Notes
Cutting Power	3.5/5	Great for grass and small weeds
Battery Life	4/5	20–30 mins per 2.0Ah battery
Ease of Use	5/5	Super easy for beginners
Edging Performance	4.5/5	Wheels help keep clean, straight lines
Weight & Balance	4.5/5	Feels light and well-balanced
Durability	4/5	Feels sturdy for a plastic build
Value for Money	4.5/5	Great if bought in a battery bundle

Who Should Buy the WORX 170?

Great for:

• Homeowners with small to mid-sized yards (up to ¼ acre)
• People who want cordless, gas-free trimming
• First-time users who want simple setup and use
• Anyone with other WORX 20V tools
• Budget-minded buyers who want a multi-use tool

Not great for:

• Landscapers or pros who need raw power
• Big yards with thick brush
• Anyone who can’t wait for battery charging

Final Thoughts on the WORX 170

If your lawn is like mine—basic, suburban, and well-kept—the WORX 170 is a smart pick. It’s not a beast, but it gets the job done without noise or gas fumes.

What stood out most for me was how light and easy it felt. My wife prefers it to our old corded trimmer, and I love that it can trim, edge, and mow with one tool.

Would I buy it again? Yes—especially in a kit with two batteries. It’s earned its spot in my garage.

👉🏿👉🏻 Check Latest Price and Offer at Amazon 👈🏻👈🏿

WORX 163 vs 170: My Honest Yard Test Comparison

If you’re like me, standing in your garage and trying to pick the right trimmer, you’ll want the real story. I’ve used both the WORX 163 (WG163) and WORX 170 (WG170 GT Revolution) across several weekends in my mid-sized yard. I wanted to know: which one really makes yard work easier?

Both are cordless, run on the 20V Power Share battery, and are built for home use. But once you start cutting, the differences show. Here’s how they compare—feature by feature—with my honest thoughts.

Blade Length — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Cutting Width	Notes
WORX 163	12 inches	Easier to trim tight spots like flower beds.
WORX 170	12 inches	Feels wider thanks to the wheel setup and grip angle.

Both have a 12-inch cut path. Specs are the same, but the 170 feels wider while edging. The 163 fits into corners better, but the 170 cleans up long lines faster.

Rating
WORX 163: 8.5/10
WORX 170: 9/10

Cutting Power — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Power System	Notes
WORX 163	20V Max Lithium	Great for light grass. Slows down in heavy spots.
WORX 170	20V Max Lithium	Feels stronger. Handles tough patches better.

They use the same battery, but the 170 cuts through thick grass easier. It needed fewer passes along my fence line than the 163. The Command Feed system helps, too.

Rating
WORX 163: 7.5/10
WORX 170: 8.5/10

Battery Life — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Runtime	Notes
WORX 163	25–30 mins	Lasts a bit longer on one charge.
WORX 170	20–25 mins	Drains faster when edging or mowing.

Both used the same 2.0Ah battery in my test. The 163 lasted a few minutes longer, which matters for quick trims during the week.

Rating
WORX 163: 8.5/10
WORX 170: 7.5/10

Handle Comfort and Grip — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Handle Style	Notes
WORX 163	Straight grip	Basic rubber. Good for short use.
WORX 170	D-grip handle	Feels better for longer trimming sessions.

After 20 minutes, my hand felt better using the 170’s D-grip. It gives you more control, especially while edging. The 163 is fine, but more basic.

Rating
WORX 163: 7.5/10
WORX 170: 9/10

Weight and Balance — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Weight	Balance Feel
WORX 163	5.3 lbs	Very light, but front-heavy.
WORX 170	5.5–6 lbs	A bit heavier, but better balance.

The 163 is lighter, and you feel it. But the 170 feels more stable, especially with the wheels. It’s easier to edge with good form.

Rating
WORX 163: 8.5/10
WORX 170: 9/10

Noise Level — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Noise Output	Notes
WORX 163	Low hum	Very quiet. Great for early use.
WORX 170	Moderate hum	A bit louder while edging, still quiet overall.

Both are much quieter than gas tools. I trimmed early morning without waking anyone. The 163 stays quieter when trimming full lawns.

Rating
WORX 163: 9/10
WORX 170: 8/10

Ease of Use — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Notes
WORX 163	Very simple. Just charge, click in, and go.
WORX 170	Takes a few more steps to set up, but easier once running.

If you’re new to trimmers, the 163 is easier at first. But the 170 wins over time, thanks to quick switches between trim and edge modes.

Rating
WORX 163: 8/10
WORX 170: 9/10

Value for Money — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Price Range	Notes
WORX 163	$100–$120	Best for light trimming and small yards.
WORX 170	$120–$150	Worth the extra cost for more features.

The 163 is cheaper and a good buy for basic yard care. The 170 adds value with its wheel system, better handle, and more control.

Rating
WORX 163: 8.5/10
WORX 170: 9/10

Final Verdict — WORX 163 vs 170

Product	Overall Score
WORX 163	8/10
WORX 170	8.5/10

If I could only keep one? I’d choose the WORX 170. It made my weekend yard work smoother—especially edging around sidewalks and driveways. The added comfort and control were worth the few extra dollars.

But if you want the lightest, simplest trimmer for quick jobs or a small yard, the WORX 163 still holds its ground.

FAQs — WORX 163 vs 170